◉Hold Desk Open the partner account
paid
Affiliate disclosure. The partner link in the masthead and in the bands beside the copy on this page is a sponsored link to a partner operator, and this site may be paid if you open an account through it, at no extra cost to you. It carries rel="sponsored noopener" and opens in a new tab. That matters on this desk in particular: the subject is the money a gambling business keeps, and this site's own revenue depends on a reader opening an account with one. There is no ranking, no review and no recommendation of any operator anywhere on this site.
Hold Desk / Myths
Figure 12

Six beliefs, each checked against the arithmetic

These are the claims that circulate about what casinos keep and what they earn. Each one is stated as it is usually made, then tested against the same sample figures used across this desk.

Figure stub
Sheet
HD-58-13
Subject
Six claims tested
Sample used
the same as the desk
Verdicts
false / partly / true
gross winWhat was kept: everything staked minus everything returned to players
the holdThe gross win divided by turnover, measured over a period and a whole book of play
net revenueWhat survives the bonus line, and the definition a reader should check first
Direct answerSix claims are tested here: that a hold is a game's edge, that a casino keeps everything staked, that deposits are revenue, that a bonus costs what it advertises, that a rising revenue means more lost per head, and that a hold of 4% is a margin of 4%. Four are false as usually stated and two are partly right.
Six claimsFour false, two partlySame sample throughoutArithmetic shown

The six claims

False

A casino's hold is the game's house edge

A hold is a period's realised retention across a whole book; an edge is a property of one game. They converge over long samples and diverge over short ones - a single day can show a hold of anything from nothing to several times the edge. The two are related and they are different quantities, as the edge page shows.

False

A casino keeps everything that is lost

It keeps the gross win, then pays bonus cost, marketing, duties and running costs out of it. In the sample, £4.00 of every £100.00 staked is kept and £0.60 of the £100.00 reaches operating profit, so 15% of what is kept survives to the bottom line and 85% of it is spent again.

False

Deposits are the operator's revenue

A deposit is the player's own money, held as a balance and withdrawable subject to the operator's conditions. It becomes turnover only if it is staked, and it never becomes revenue on its own. The same deposit can generate several times its value in turnover, which is why turnover figures look large beside deposit figures, as the two-numbers page works out.

False

A bonus costs the operator what it advertises

A bonus is granted as credit and costs the part that is wagered through and withdrawn, plus the expected payout of any free spins. In the sample, £720,000.00 of credit was granted and £252,000.00 of it was realised, with 65% forfeited, so the cost is a fraction of the advertised ceiling, as the bonus page sets out.

Partly

Rising revenue means each player is losing more

Gross win can rise because more customers played, because the same customers staked more, or because a mix moved towards a higher-holding product. Only one of those is a statement about what an individual lost, and the customer count is in the denominator for exactly that reason - see the customer page and the mix page.

Partly

A 4% hold is a 4% profit margin

The first half is right and the second does not follow. A hold of 4.0% is a real figure on the sample's turnover; the margin on the same turnover is 0.6%, because four lines of cost sit between them. The two percentages are related by the arithmetic on the pound-of-stakes page and by nothing else.

Why these six. Each one is a claim a reader is likely to meet, and each one is checkable with the arithmetic already on this site. Two of them are partly right, which is recorded rather than forced into a verdict, because a desk that finds everything false is not measuring anything. No claim here is about a named operator and no figure here is anyone's real published number.